Its simply not convincing, and usually makes matters worse. It also helps erode our trust in businesses overall.
When it apologized, it made a point of noting its failure in communicating its plans, which violated Apology Rule #1: Never qualify your apology with some explanation or nuanced excuse.
Celebrities and politicians do it all the time they arent sorry for saying or doling something wrong, but that others misheard or misjudged them often by declaring that theyre sorry their words offended people, or that someone took offense.
Such apologies convince nobody, and often further piss people off, which is what Evernotes statement accomplished.
Also, when it announced that it would backtrack from its announced plans, it suggested that itll find another way to pretty much do the same thing anyway.
Apologies that arent followed by binding and reliable actions are what define dysfunctional relationships between people, and our relationships with businesses are no different.
Customers not to mention employees, investors, and other stakeholders are desperate for accurate news, but they also want to learn the rules of the road that apply to their relationships.
What can I expect? Whats considered out of bounds for corporate behavior? How will I know what Im being told is true, completely, and not expertly riddled with caveats and escape clauses?
When a company says it is going to do something, can I trust it?
Apology Rule #2 is that these qualities are more important that any apology, so when Evernote announced that it will still do what it just announced it wont do, only do it differently, it all but erased the value of its apology.
Leave it to its most expert critics to reject the entire exercise…
Read the entire essay at Linkedin